Hamoodur Rahman Commission Report. The War Inquiry Commission was appointed by the President of Pakistan in December In its secret report, never. Hamoodur Rahman Commission Report The War Inquiry Commission was appointed by the President of Pakistan in December In its secret report, never. Hamoodur Rahman Commission is probably the only postwar inquiry commission authorized by the Pakistani government that inquired and submitted report on.
|Published (Last):||3 March 2005|
|PDF File Size:||10.27 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||1.59 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
The full ir, he demanded, echoing even those who have questioned the motives behind publication, must now be made public. Rahim Khan and some of the Brigadiers, we cannot help remarking that all the Senior Officers stationed uur East Pakistan immediately before and during the war of must be held collectively responsible for the failings and weaknesses which led to the defeat of the Pakistan Army. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Retrieved 22 August It is, therefore, clear that the figures mentioned by the Dacca authorities are altogether fantastic and fanciful. Question of Responsibility The Report maintained that there was no actual order to surrender.
Hamoodur Rahman Commission Report
Farman Ali merely functioned as an intelligent, well-intentioned and sincere staff officer in the various appointments held by him, and at no stage could he be regarded as being a member of the inner military junta surrounding and supporting General Yahya Khan. The General has further explained that as Mr Toha and his associates had communist leanings, these words were intended to convey their conviction and objective that East Pakistan would be turned into a communist state, and comjission that 33 there would be bloodshed.
All the Senior Hamoor Commanders who were concerned with the administration of Martial Law in East Pakistan as well as the senior civil servants who were inducted into the civil reoprt in East Pakistan, have expressed the view that military action could not have been a substitute for a political settlement, which was feasible once law and order has been restored within a matter of few weeks after the military action.
Apart, therefore, from the reporrt and political expediency of the kind of military action taken by General Yahya Khan on the 25th of March,it was his culpable failure to arrive at a political settlement with the Awami League during the crucial months preceding the war that completely alienated the sympathies of the population of East Pakistanis, confirming their suspicion that the Generals were not prepared to part with political power in favour of the 75 elected representatives of the people.
Ir appears to us to be the genesis of the looting alleged to have been indulged in by the Army in East Pakistan.
Get what you want. Niazi any finding in this behalf must await his return from India where he is at present held as a prisoner of war”. He states that thereafter no further action was taken in ug matter. Home Events Prehistoric — The Year — — — — — — — — — — — Present Personalities Prehistoric — The Year — — — — — — — — — — — Present Videos Prehistoric — The Year — — — — — — — — Present Jinnah Glimpses Contributed By People.
An explanation was called from the Commanding Officer, Brigadier, Saghir Hussain and he has denied the allegation stating that all the personnel, barring a few who had either deserted or did not return from leave, were safely evacuated to West Pakistan under arrangements of Eastern Command, and they were later repatriated to Bangladesh along with other East Pakistani personnel.
The Commission recommended that these grave allegations be dealt with seriously. The net result of this strategy was to give the opposite advantage to the enemy, who at his leisure routed and dispersed our troops while himself concentratingly advanced in order towards Dacca.
We find that there are several provisions in ud Pakistan Army Act having a direct bearing on this matter. The failure on part of the Eastern Command to so plan amounts to gross negligence for, in factwhat was done was merely to give battle in weakness and be forced to retreat in disorder.
He was Commander, Artillery 14 Div.
History creates hell – Neighbours News – Issue Date: Sep 4,
The debate at one level is about the shame that Pakistan has been put to. He would also be liable to be punished if he shows a lack of will to fight and surrenders to the enemy at a juncture when he still had the resources and the capability to put up resistance.
Such cases have found mention in the relevant portions of 65 our report, but by and large cases of these junior officers must be left to be dealt with by hmaood respective Service Headquarters who have ordained detailed briefing reports from all of them and are also in possession of their performance by their immediate superiors.
On the basis of the evidence coming before the Commission, we have been able to indicate only in general terms commisxion direct and indirect responsibility of certain senior commanders and others, but the question of fixing individual responsibility and awarding punishment appropriate thereto need to be determined according to the prescribed procedures available under the Pakistan Army Act and other applicable laws of the land. I wrote out an instruction to act as a guide for decent behaviour and recommended action required to be taken to win over the hearts of the people.
As these gentlemen had gone underground, General Farman Ali could not take any further action against them.
The traditional concept of defence adopted by Pakistan Army was that the defence of East Pakistan lies in West Pakistan.
General Niazi’s conduct of waras also his final decision to surrender, have, therefore, to be judged in this light. There is evidence to the effect that civilian shops and stores were broken into by the troops without preparing any record of what was taken and from where.
Hamoodur Rahman Commission Report
Ministry of Liberation War Affairs. For other uses, see Hamoodur Rahman Commission Report. We mention these facts not in justification of the atrocities or other crimes alleged to have been committed by the Pakistani Army during its operations in East Pakistan, but only to put the record straight and to enable the allegations to be judged in their correct perspective.
The impression created on the fahman of the West Pakistani civilian officials, then serving in East Pakistan, has been stated thus by Mr. Farman Ali, as gahman facts stated by him are easily verifiable and we do not think that he would have made incorrect statements in this behalf before the Commission.